stdClass Object ( [id] => 7718 [paper_index] => EW201908-01-002914 [title] => A STUDY OF HARYANA RICE SECTOR IN POST-REFORM ERA [description] =>
  1. Chand (1999). Agricultural Marketing and Trade in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, pp.368.
  2. Datta, K. S., (2007). Problems and Prospects of India’s Rice Trade in a WTO Regime.  Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, Vol.12, No.2, pp.155-182.
  3. Datta, S. K. (1996). India’s Trade Prospects for Rice. In Chand, R. And Haque, T., Visions of India’s Rice Trade. National Commission on Agricultural Policies, New Delhi, pp.14-15.
  4. Giraud, G. (2013). The World Market of Fragrant Rice: Main Issues and Perspectives, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 16, Issue 2, p.1.
  5. Gulati, A., and Narayanan, S (2003). Subsidy Syndrome in Indian Agriculture. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  6. Gulati, A. and Sharma, A. (1997). Freeing Trade in Agriculture: Implications for Resources Use Efficiency and Cropping Pattern Changes. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.32, pp.154-164.   
  7. Gulati, A., James, H. and Garr, P. (1990). Effective Incentives in India’s Agriculture the Case of Wheat, Rice, Cotton and Groundnut. Research Working Paper, World Bank, New Delhi.
  8. Hoda, A., and Gulati, A. (2007). WTO Negotiations on Agriculture and Developing Countries. (Chapter 3) Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. Khush, G. S., Virk, P. S. (2005). IR varieties and their impact. Los Banos (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, Vol. 16, Issue 2, p.1.
  10. Mohanty, S., Wailes, E., and Chavez, E. (2010). The Global Rice Supply and Demand Outlook: The Need for Greater Productivity Growth to Keep Rice Affordable. In: Prebisch, R. (1950), The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems, New York: United Nations
  11. Mohanty, S. (2009). Rice and the global financial crisis. Rice Today, Vol.8, No.1, p.40.
  12. Pursell, G., Gulati, A., and Gupta, K. (2007). Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in India. Agricultural Distortions Project Working the World Bank, Washington DC. University Press.
  13. Singh, R. (2003). Globalization, Agrarian Situation And Sustainability in Haryana – A Sociological Appraisal. Agricultural Situation in India.
  14. Sharma, S. K. (2013). Doha Negotiations and Domestic Support to Indian Agricultural Sector. Centre for WTO Studies, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, Working Paper No. CWS/WP/200/12, pp.1-22.
[author] => Dr. Jaiparkash [googlescholar] => https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=KeqZGcIAAAAJ&hl=en [doi] => [year] => 2019 [month] => August [volume] => 7 [issue] => 8 [file] => eprapub/EW201908-01-002914.pdf [abstract] =>

The purpose of this study to examine the economic efficiency and competitiveness of rice sector of Haryana state in the post-reform era using various indicators like Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC), Effective Protection Coefficient (EPC), Effective Subsidy Coefficient (ESC) and Domestic Resource Cost (DRC). The results of the study based on secondary data found that Haryana has competitive and comparative advantage in the production of rice crop since its inception; however, the rice market is still facing many challenges like transportation, high fees and taxation at the local level, high extent of levy, handling and storage facilities at the port, and fluctuated government export policy which need to be tackled carefully.

KEY WORDS: MEP, MSP, CACP, FAO and Green Revolution.

[keywords] => [doj] => [hit] => 1306 [status] => [award_status] => P [orderr] => 26 [journal_id] => 4 [googlesearch_link] => [edit_on] => [is_status] => 1 [journalname] => EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review(JEBR) [short_code] => IJES [eissn] => 2347-9671 (O), 2349-0187(P) [pissn] => [home_page_wrapper] => images/products_image/12.JEBR.png ) Error fetching PDF file.