stdClass Object ( [id] => 7731 [paper_index] => EW201908-01-002916 [title] => DISSIMILARITIES IN THE BEHAVIOURAL PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN IN RURAL AND URBAN AREA [description] =>
  1. Arnold, F., Bulatao, R. A., Buripakdi, c., Chung, B. , Fawcett, J. T., Iritani, T., Lee, S. 1., & Wu, T. S. (1975). The value of children: Vo!. 1. Introduction and comparative analysis. Honolulu, HI: East-West Population Institute.
  2. Bharat, S. (2001). On the periphery: The psychology of gender. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Psychology in India revisited: Developments in the discipline, Vol. 2 (pp. 300- 355). New Delhi: Sage.
  3. Government of India (2002). Economic Survey 2001-2002. Government of India: Ministry of Finance, Economic Division.
  4. Hoffman, L. W. (1988). Cross-cultural differences in childrearing goals. In R. A. LeVine, P. M. Miller, & M. M. West (Eds.), Parental behavior in diverse societies. New directions for child development (pp. 99-122).
  5. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Hoffman, L. W., & Hoffman, M. L. (1973). The value of children to parents. In 1. T. Fawcett (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on population (pp. 19-76). New York: Basic Books.
  6. Mishra, R. C. (1994). Individualist-collectivist orientations across generations. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 225-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. Mishra, R. C. (1997). Family support and health care in a culturally changing community in northern India. Social Science International, 13, 10-18.
  8. Mishra, R. C. (2001). Health cognition and practices among the Kharwars of Naugarh region of Varanasi. Paper presented at the National Seminar on Tribal Health in India: Present Status and Future Perspectives, Department of Social Sciences, National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, February8-1O.
  9. Rao, T.V. (1981). Psychology of population and family planning. In U. Pareek (Ed.), A survey of research in psychology, 1971-1976, Part II. (pp. 714-746). Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
  10. Saraswathi, T. S., & Dutta, R. (1988). Current trends in developmental psychology: A life span perspective. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Psychology in India: The state-of theart (pp. 93-152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Schwarz, B., Chakkarath, P., Trommsdorff, G., Schwenk, 0., & Nauck, B. (2001). Report on selected instruments of the value of children main study. Unpublished Manuscript, University ofKonstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
  12. Sinha, D. (1969). Indian villages in transition. New Delhi: Asia Publishing Company.
  13. Sinha, D. (1988). The family scenario in a developing country and its implications for mental health: The case of India. In P. R. Dasen, 1. W. Berry, & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology: Toward applications (pp. 48-71). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  14. Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method. and practice (pp. 123-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Thurstone, (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Trommsdorff, G., Zheng, G., & Tardif, T. (2002). Value of children and intergenerational relations in cultural context. In P. Boski, F. 1. R. van de Vijver, & A. M. Chodynicka (Eds.), New directions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 581-601). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii.
[author] => Dr. Pradeep Kumar [googlescholar] => https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=KeqZGcIAAAAJ&hl=en [doi] => [year] => 2019 [month] => August [volume] => 7 [issue] => 8 [file] => eprapub/EW201908-01-002916.pdf [abstract] =>

It is the behavioural pattern of a child deciding what type of citizen he/she is going to become. A comparative study was conducted to know behaviour problems shown by children in rural and urban communities at school level. The design selected for this study is comparative research design which is descriptive in nature. To carry out the present study the population comprises of children from urban and rural areas of Etah & Kasganj cities of Uttar Pradesh. A sample size of 200 was arbitrarily taken (100 from rural & 100 from urban areas) of Etah & Kasganj cities 10 villages of these areas. Researcher employed random sampling technique to select sample units of the study. The findings of the study show that rural children do not differ significantly than urban children in personality problems. Urban children significantly have much more anti-social problems than rural children. Urban children are going to form better human capital with more anti-social behaviour in comparison to rural children, which in the present socio-economic and political context is sure to increase the disparity in urban & rural development.

KEYWORDS: Behaviour problems, Home-school influences, Rural/urban communities

[keywords] => [doj] => [hit] => 1161 [status] => [award_status] => P [orderr] => 13 [journal_id] => 4 [googlesearch_link] => [edit_on] => [is_status] => 1 [journalname] => EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review(JEBR) [short_code] => IJES [eissn] => 2347-9671 (O), 2349-0187(P) [pissn] => [home_page_wrapper] => images/products_image/12.JEBR.png ) Error fetching PDF file.