stdClass Object ( [id] => 7771 [paper_index] => EW201906-01-002847 [title] => DIMENSIONS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: TRANSFER COSTS AND TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITY [description] =>
  1. Teece, DJ (1977), “Technology Transfer by Mulitinational Firms : The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How”, Economic Journal
  2. Mourshed, Mona (1992),  “Technology Transfer Dynamics: Lessons from the Egyptian and Pharmaceutical Industry”
  3. Teece, DJ (1981), “The Market for Know-How and Efficient International Transfer for Technology”
  4. Kale, Dinar & Little, Steve (October 2010), “From Imitation to Innovation: The Evolution of R&D Capabilities and Learning Processes in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry”
  5. Kale, Dinar & Little, Steve & Hinton, Matt, “Developing The Knowledge Creation Capability For Innovation – The Case Of The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry”
  6. Srinivas, Smita, “Technological Learning and The Evolution of the Indian Pharmacurtical  and Bio-pharmacuetical Sectors”
  7. Singer (H.W), book on “Technology Transfer by Multinationals”
  8. Jinchang, Qian & Xiaojing Guan & Jefferson, G.H &  Hu, Albert G.Z., “R&D and Technology Transfer:Firm-Level Evidence from Chinese Industry”
  9. Yingming, YUE &Feifei, YUE, “Research on Technology Transfer in the Pharmaceutical Industry”
  10. PRETNAR, BOJAN, “Commercialization Of Patents And Know-How From Academia To Industry,Joint Ventures, Avoiding The Pitfalls, Contractual Issues”
  11. December 2008 “The Interface Between IPRs, Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer (UNCTAD) Development Dimensions of IntellectualPropertyRights »
  12. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/circ488/circ488_sect1.pdf
  13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
  14. Haque, I. U., Bell, M., Dahlman, C., Lall, S., & Pavitt, K. (1996), ‘‘Trade, technology, and international competitiveness’’, The World Bank
  15. Bhaduri, S., & Ray, A. S. (2004), ‘‘Exporting through technological capability: Econometric evidence from India's pharmaceutical and electrical/electronics firms’’, Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 87-100
  16. Irwin, L. H. (2005), ‘‘Technology transfer’’, Millennium Papers, Transportation Research Board
[author] => Fiyanshu Sindhwani [googlescholar] => https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=KeqZGcIAAAAJ&hl=en [doi] => [year] => 2019 [month] => June [volume] => 7 [issue] => 6 [file] => eprapub/EW201906-01-002847.pdf [abstract] =>

Countries frequently rely on successful assimilation of foreign technology to achieve indigenous growth. But success depends on various factors. The factors include technological capability of the country, transfer costs, government policies, political structure, patent laws etc. In our paper we focus on two of these factors namely, technological capability of the country and transfer costs. We explore technological capability through the “capability creation model” given by Kale and Little (2010). To test the theory empirically, we took data from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. We find that post the year 2005 (i.e., post TRIPs) there is strong IPR regime i.e. reverse engineering is restricted. Because of strong IPR regime there will be more technology transfers because of increase in the royalty payments. We also find a positive and significant relationship between increasing technology transfers post 2005 and firms own R&D expenditure.

KEYWORDS: Royalty Payments, R&D, TRIPs, Technology Transfers, Indian pharmaceutical industry

[keywords] => [doj] => [hit] => 1574 [status] => [award_status] => P [orderr] => 19 [journal_id] => 4 [googlesearch_link] => [edit_on] => [is_status] => 1 [journalname] => EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review(JEBR) [short_code] => IJES [eissn] => 2347-9671 (O), 2349-0187(P) [pissn] => [home_page_wrapper] => images/products_image/12.JEBR.png ) Error fetching PDF file.