stdClass Object ( [id] => 7871 [paper_index] => EW201811-13-002626 [title] => THEORETICAL REVIEW OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE [description] =>
  1.  Ashforth, B.E.; Mael, F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14, 20–39.
  2. Carton, R.B. (2004) Measuring Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens. Flash Report: 82% of the S&P 500 Companies Published Corporate Sustainability Reports in 2016. Available online: http://3blmedia.com/News/Flash-Report-82-SP-500-Companies-Published-Corporate- Sustainability-Reports-2016 (accessed on 23 August 2017).
  3. Cropanzano, R.; Mitchell, M.S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Manag. 2005, 31, 874–900. [CrossRef]
  4.  Dutton, J.E.; Dukerich, J.M.; Harquail, C.V. Organizational images and member identification. Adm. Sci. Q. 1994, 39, 239–263. [CrossRef]
  5.  Gavrea, C., Ilies, L. and Stegerean, R. (2011) Determinants of Organizational Performance: The Case of Romania. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society , 6, 285-300.
  6.  Griffin, M. (2003) Organizational Performance Model.
  7.  Hernaus, T., Bach, M. and Vuksic, V. (2012) Influence of Strategic Approach to BPM on Financial and Non-Financial Performance. Baltic Journal of Management , 7, 376-396.
  8. Korkchi, S., and Rombaut, A. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility. A case of private and public corporations. Unpublished.
  9.  Lund-Thomsen, P. Towards a critical framework on corporate social and environmental responsibility in the south: The case of Pakistan. Development 2004, 47, 106–113. [CrossRef]
  10. Mael, F.; Ashforth, B.E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 1992, 13, 103–123. [CrossRef]
  11.  Margolis, J.D.; Elfenbein, H.A.; Walsh, J.P. Does It Pay to Be Good? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Available online: https://books.google.com.hk/books/about/Does_it_Pay_to_be_Good.html?id=hE3OnQAACAAJ& redir_esc=y (accessed on 23 August 2017).
  12. Masa’deh, R., Obeidat, O. and Tarhini, A. (2016) A Jordanian Empirical Study of the Associations among Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and Firm Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Management Development , 35, 681-705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2015-0134
  13. McWilliams, A.; Siegel, D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strat. Manag. J. 2000, 21, 603–609. [CrossRef]
  14.  Qian, W.; Junsheng, D.; Shenghua, S. A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Bus. Soc. 2015, 55, 1–39.
  15.  Ramezan, M., Sanjaghi, M.E. and Baly, H.R.K. (2013) Organizational Change Capacity and Organizational Performance. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China, 5, 188-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKIC-07-2013-0012
  16. Rettab, B., Brik, A.B. and Mellahi, K. (2009) A Study of Management Perceptions of Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Performance in Emerging Economic: A Case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics , 89, 317-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0005-9
  17. Swapna, P. (2011). Role of CSR in Community Development. VSRD International Journal of Business Management Research Vol 1 (9) pp 559-601.
  18. Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed.;Worchel, S., Austin, W.G., Eds.; Nelson-Hall: Chicago, IL, USA, 1986; pp. 7–24.
  19. Tyler, T.R. Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Res. Organ. Behav. 1999, 21, 201–246.
  20. Tyler, T.R.; Degoey, P.; Smith, H.J. Understanding why the fairness of group procedures matters: A test of psychological dynamics of the group-value model. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 70, 913–930. [CrossRef]
  21.  Walley, N.; Whitehead, B. It’s not easy being green. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1994, 72, 46–52. 60 Korkchi, S., and Rombaut, A. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility. A case of private and public corporations. Unpublished
[author] => Aisha Mirghani Shibeika [googlescholar] => https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=KeqZGcIAAAAJ&hl=en [doi] => [year] => 2019 [month] => January [volume] => 7 [issue] => 1 [file] => eprapub/EW201811-13-002626.pdf [abstract] =>

The concept of Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) was a popular topic for management discussion. It was widely discussed over the past 50 years. With the accelerations of global integration, CSR has become an essential part of the business strategy Corporate Social Responsibility is how business organization activities influences the stakeholder intrest.CSR plays a very important role in organizational performance. .Achieving organizational objectives in the long run and maximum organization performance, requires giving full attention to (CSR). The societies where business is located occupy a central place in corporate culture affecting the firm performance thus necessitating change in the internal organization structures, processes and behavior. A theoretical review of CSR practices foe ex: Social Identity Theory (SIT) and stakeholder theory   are revealed a strong link between a firm’s CSR practices and its performance.

 KEYWORDS: Corporate social responsibility, organizational performance, (SIT) and (ST)

[keywords] => [doj] => [hit] => 1462 [status] => [award_status] => P [orderr] => 12 [journal_id] => 4 [googlesearch_link] => [edit_on] => [is_status] => 1 [journalname] => EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review(JEBR) [short_code] => IJES [eissn] => 2347-9671 (O), 2349-0187(P) [pissn] => [home_page_wrapper] => images/products_image/12.JEBR.png ) Error fetching PDF file.