stdClass Object ( [id] => 8123 [paper_index] => EW201801-01-002237 [title] => THE EMPATHETIC ENGAGEMENT OF AKEANON BUKIDNON WOMEN FARMERS ON VEGETAL LIFE [description] =>
  1. Agosta, Lou. (2010). Empathy in the Context of Philosophy. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Berenson, B. (1909) The Florentine Painters of the Renaissance (Third Edition, New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
  3. Bergson, H. (2005). Creative Evolution. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.
  4. Blakemore, S-J. et al. (2005) Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision–touch synaesthesia. Brain 128: 1571–1583.
  5. Brüne, M. (2005) ‘‘Theory of Mind’’ in Schizophrenia: A Review of the Literature, Schizophrenia Bulletin vol. 31: 21–42.
  6. Boyce Gibson, W. (1928) The Philosophy of Melchior Palágyi. (II) The Theory of Life and Mind, Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 3: 158-172.
  7. Caims, D. (1976). Conservation with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Marinus Nighoff.
  8. Clark, A. and Grush, R. (1999) “Towards a Cognitive Robotics”, Adaptive Behavior, 7: 5-16
  9. Crane, T. (2006) “Is there a perceptual relation?”, in T. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds) Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press.
  10. Currie, G. and Ravenscroft, I. (2002) Recreative Minds. Oxford University Press.
  11. Damasio, A. (1999) The Feeling for what Happens, London, Heinemann.
  12. De La Mettrie, J. (1994). Man as Machine and Man as Plant. Trans. Watson and Rybalka. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.
  13. Dokic, J. (2003) The sense of ownership: an analogy between sensation and action, in J. Roessler and N. Eilan (eds) Agency and Self-Awareness. Oxford University Press.
  14. Ellis, H. and Young, A. (1990) Accounting for delusional misidentifications. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157: 239-248
  15. Freedberg, D. and Gallese, V. (2007) “Motion, emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience”, Trends in Cognitive Science, 11: 197-203.
  16. Goldie, P. (2004) “Emotion, reason and virtue”, in D. Evans and P. Cruse (eds), Emotion, Evolution and Rationality, Oxford University Press.
  17. Goldman, A. (2006) Simulating Minds. Oxford University Press.
  18. Hall, M. (2009).Plant Autonomy and Plant Human Ethics. Environmental Ethics 16, pp.169-181.
  19. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. and Pulvermüller, F., 2004. “Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex “, Neuron 41: 301–307
  20. Heal, J. (2003) Mind, Reason and Imagination, Cambridge University Press.
  21. Hegel, GWF. (2004).Philosophy of Nature: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, Part II. Tran. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Herder, G. (2002) Sculpture, edited and translated by Jason Gaiger, Chicago University Press. Originally published as Plastik, 1778.
  23. Husserl, E. (1980). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology  and to a Phenomenological Philosophical: Book 3 Phenomenology and the Foundation of Sciences (Hereafter: Ideas III).
  24. Irvin, S. (2008) Scratching an Itch, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66: 25-35.
  25. Kandel, S., Orliaguet, J. P., & Viviani, P. (2000). Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence. Perception & Psychophysics, 62: 706-716.
  26. Keysers, C. et al. (2004) A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42: 335–346
  27. Kim, J., Doop, M., Blake, R. and Park, S. (2005) Impaired visual recognition of biological motion in schizophrenia.  Schizophrenia Research, 77: 299-307
  28. Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt E., Flach, R. and Prinz, W. (2002) Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: evidence for action simulation during action perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 55: 1027–1046.
  29. Langfeld. H. (1920) The Aesthetic Attitude. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company
  30. Lee, V. and Anstruther-Thomson, C. (1897) “Beauty and Ugliness”, Contemporary Review, 72: 544-569; 669-688.
  31. Lee, V. (1913) The Beautiful: An Introduction to Psychological Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Lipps, T(1903)  Ästhetik, Part One. Leipzig, Hamburg: Leopold Voss Verlag.
  33. Lotze, H. (1856) Mikrokosmos, volume 1, Leipzig, Hirzel.
  34. Lotze, H. (1868) Geschichte der Aesthetik in Deutschland. Munich, Cotta.
  35. Marder, M. (2009). The Event of the Thing: Derrida’s Post Deconstruction Reaction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
  36. Marder, M. .(2012.). Plant Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
  37. Martin A.; Wiggs C.L.; Ungerleider L.G.; Haxby J.V. (1996) “Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge” Nature 379: 649-652
  38. 38.Millar, A. (2000) “The Scope of Perceptual Knowledge”, Philosophy, 75: 73-88.
  39. Mitchell, W. Structure and Growth of the Mind, London, Methuen, 1907, excerpted in E. F. Carritt (ed) Philosophies of Beauty, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1931.
  40. Mondero, B. (2006) “Proprioception as an aesthetic sense” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64: 231-242.
  41. Murata, A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Raos, V. and Rizzolatti, G. (1997). 'Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (Area F5) of the monkey'. In Journal of Neurophysiology 78: 2226-2230.
  42. Neitsche, F. (2006).  The Nietzsche Reader. New York and London.  Wiley Blackwell.
  43. Noshbaum, M. (2003). Upeavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotion.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  44. Novalis (Georg Philipp Friedrick von Hardenberg) (1802) Die Lehrlinge zu Sais in ed. Paul Kluckhohn and Richard Samuel (eds) Novalis Schriften (Second edition, Stuttgart, Kohlhammer,1960), volume 1.
  45. Palágyi, M. (1924) Naturphilosophische Vorlesungen über die Grundprobleme des Bewusstseins und des Lebens, Second edition, Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.
  46. Prinz, J. (2006) Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford University Press.
  47. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. and Ilmoniemi, R. (2005)
    Functional links between motor and language systems, European Journal of Neuroscience 21: 793–797.
  48. Raposo, A., Moss, H., Stamatakis, A. & Tyler. L. (2009) “Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences” Neuropsychologia, 47: 388-396
  49. Robinson, J. (2006) Deeper than Reason. Oxford University Press.
  50. Scheler, M. (1970) The Nature of Sympathy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.de Sousa, R. (1990) The Rationality of Emotions. MIT Press.
  51. Schopenhauer, A. (1998) On the Basis of Morality. Trans. Payne. Indianapolis: Hackett.
  52. Slate, M. (2007) The Ethics of Care and Empathy. London and New York: Routledge.
  53. Steiner, G. (2011). Anthropocentrism and Discontent. The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  54. Tichener, E. (1909) Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of the Thought Processes. New York, Macmillan.
  55. Vischer, R. (1873) ‘Über das Optische Formgefühl’  (translated into English in H. Mallgrave and E. Ikonomou (eds) Empathy, Form and Space, Getty Centre for the History of Art and the Humanities, 1994).
  56. Viviani, P. (2002) “Motor Competence in the Perception of Dynamic Events,” in Wolfgang Prinz, and Bernhard Hommel (eds) Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance Volume 14, Oxford University Press.
  57. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992). Biological movements look constant: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18: 603-623.
  58. Walton, K. (1999) ‘Projectivism, Empathy, and Musical Tension’. Philosophical Topics 26 (1999): 407–440
  59. Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J-P., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. (2003) “Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula: The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust”, Neuron, 40: 655–664.
  60. Wilson, R. and Brown, R. (2008). Humanitarianism and Suffering: The Mobilization of Empathy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[author] => Maria Imelda Pastrana Nabor, Ph.D. [googlescholar] => https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=KeqZGcIAAAAJ&hl=en [doi] => [year] => 2018 [month] => January [volume] => 6 [issue] => 1 [file] => eprapub/EW201801-01-002237.pdf [abstract] =>

 This paper is an exploration on the probable ethical consideration of vegetal beings stemming in empathy.  Empathetic paradigm to vegetal life is conceivable to be in concurrence with the indispensable features of plant ontology. What vegetal life seems to endeavor? The emotive sphere of empathy with vegetal life eclipses their mode of being and projects, the constructs as well as the goals hope or intended by the human empathizer onto the object of empathy.  The disclosure on vegetal life depicts the finitude of empathy, its anthropocentric and probable unethical underpinnings.

           Empathizing with vegetal life is a potentially conceivable reality.  The philosophical viewpoint of this probability declines the uniqueness of vegetal beings and may be regarded as ambassadors of something huge than ourselves i.e., the sacredness of life.  Empathy is exemplified on this elemental commonality.  The substantial congruence of the empathizer and the empathized with, fused by one reality that both are living beings.  The community of living then engenders the intended foundation for the ethical compartment.

            The peculiar ontology of vegetal life must be depicted as an embodied finitude to empathy and is considered resistance to a totalizing vitalism.  Such presupposition depicts a series of impediments to the humanistic, anthropocentric, and narcissistic ethics predicated on the underlying sameness of the ethical action as well as the object of a human action.  This viewpoint is not claiming that vegetal beings indispensably undermines the ethics of empathy.  It is not also proposing that an alternative (non-empathetic, or the eclipse of emotive sphere, and non-rational) ethical paradigm to vegetal life, is unfathomable.  An ethics can stem from vegetal life would decline human self-recognition in and projection onto the sphere of the flora, or more, specifically, would indispensably consider an affirmation of the irreducible distinction between this sphere and that of human’s earthly existence.

KEYWORDS: vegetal life, Empathy, Vegetal Ontology, environmental crime

[keywords] => [doj] => [hit] => 1352 [status] => [award_status] => P [orderr] => 27 [journal_id] => 4 [googlesearch_link] => [edit_on] => [is_status] => 1 [journalname] => EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review(JEBR) [short_code] => IJES [eissn] => 2347-9671 (O), 2349-0187(P) [pissn] => [home_page_wrapper] => images/products_image/12.JEBR.png ) Error fetching PDF file.