stdClass Object ( [id] => 8402 [paper_index] => EW201705-01-001832 [title] => TRADE COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN INDIA AND LATIN AMERICA [description] =>
  1. Balassa, Bela (1965); ‘Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage’, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 33; Pages: 99-123.
  2. Balassa, Bela (1977); ‘Revealed Comparative Advantage Revisited: An Analysis of Relative Export Shares of the Industrial Countries, 1953-1971’, The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, Vol. 45, Issue 4; Pages: 327-44.
  3. Balassa, Bela (1979); ‘The Changing Pattern of Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, No. 2; Pages: 259-266.
  4. Balassa, Bela (1986); ‘Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, No. 2; Pages: 315-319.
  5. BRICS-TERN (2011); ‘India’s Experiences On Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs)’, Paper prepared for the launch meeting of BRICS Trade and Economics Research Network (BRICS-TERN), Shanghai.
  6. Fertȍ, Imre and Lionel J. Hubbard (2002); ‘Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness in Hungarian Agri-Food Sectors’, Institute of Economics, Hungary Academy of Sciences, Discussion Paper Series 2002/8.
  7. Kawai, Masahiro (2004); ‘Regional Economic Integration and Co-operation in East Asia’, mimeo.
  8. Li, Kui-Wai and Siegfried Bender, (2003), ‘Relative Advantage of Manufacture Exports Among World Regions: 1981-1999’, APEC Study Center Consortium Annual Conference, Phuket, Thailand.
  9. Vollrath, T. L. (1991); ‘A Theoretical Evaluation of Alternative Trade Intensity Measures of Revealed Comparative Advantage’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 130; Pages: 265–279.
  10. Yeats, Alexander J. (1997); ‘Does Mercosur’s Trade Performance Raise Concerns About the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements’, International Economics Department, The World Bank.

 

[author] => Dr. Rohita Deshprabhu Kamat [googlescholar] => https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=KeqZGcIAAAAJ&imq=EPRA+International+Journal+of+Economic+and+Business+Review&citation_for_view=KeqZGcIAAAAJ:FPJr55Dyh1AC [doi] => [year] => 2017 [month] => May [volume] => 5 [issue] => 5 [file] => eprapub/EW201705-01-001832.pdf [abstract] =>

In 1997, the Government of India announced an Action Plan, the Focus LAC, with the express motive of revitalizing India-Latin America trade and economic relations. This venture enhanced the trade relationships between the two countries. Hundreds of companies from India invested approximately US 12 billion dollars in Latin America in various fields pertaining to agriculture, automobiles, cosmetics, energy, mining, etc. On the other hand Latin American countries too reciprocated by investment of approximately US one billion dollars in automobile parts, electronics, multiplexes, steel, etc. India has signed Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) with some of the larger countries of the Latin American region like Colombia, Chile, Brazil and Venezuela. Also, in the offing is the constitution of Joint Working Groups to further explore bilateral mechanisms for enhanced economic and trade linkages with Mexico, Brazil and Colombia.

The present study identifies the complementary sectors and commodities which have been focused on the India – MERCOSUR PTA (Preferential Trade Agreement) i.e. trade between Latin America and India. Trade Intensity Index enables the assessment of the trade value in a bilateral context of the two countries with regards to the value of the trade whether increased or decreased. The study used the Intra-Regional Trade Intensity Index developed by Kawai (2004), to explain the significance of intra-regional trade of a RTA to the Global trade. If the index shows more than one then it is indicative of a healthy flourishing trade. The study is based on export and import data on 17 sectors and the entire data are sourced from International Trade Statistics and cover a period from 1995 to 2013. The Product level RCA indices have been calculated for 255 commodities/products using the data provided by UNCTAD using the statistical database of the Harmonised system (HS – 1996) classification for the year 2013.

Keywords: India, Latin America, MERCOSUR, RCAI, Trade

[keywords] => [doj] => [hit] => 1589 [status] => [award_status] => P [orderr] => 17 [journal_id] => 4 [googlesearch_link] => [edit_on] => [is_status] => 1 [journalname] => EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review(JEBR) [short_code] => IJES [eissn] => 2347-9671 (O), 2349-0187(P) [pissn] => [home_page_wrapper] => images/products_image/12.JEBR.png ) Error fetching PDF file.