This study set out to examine the Level of compliance of barangays in relation to the documentary requirements on collection, disbursement, reimbursement, and procurement processes. Grounded in actual performance data across multiple districts, the findings point to a generally high level of adherence, with most barangays exhibiting a firm grasp of the essential documentation protocols mandated by existing policies. Results show that barangays are compliant in terms of collection processes, posting a mean score of 4.30. Disbursement and reimbursement procedures stood out with higher levels of full compliance, reaching 4.71 and 4.57, respectively. Procurement compliance also yielded positive results, averaging 4.65. Among the districts, District 2 emerged with the highest overall scores across all areas. In contrast, Districts 4, 5, and 8 registered relatively lower averages, suggesting possible gaps in training, access to resources, or management practices. The statistical analysis revealed that there are significant differences in compliance levels among the eight districts (p < 0.05), indicating that geographical or administrative contexts may influence how well barangays meet the required standards. Despite these encouraging overall numbers, the study also uncovered persistent issues. Nearly all barangays reported encountering challenges, especially in terms of inadequate training, inefficient workflows, and a lack of proper equipment and software for records management. For instance, in the area of procurement, over 98% of respondents cited limited technical expertise and financial constraints as key barriers. The results draw attention to a pressing need for capacity-building programs and sustained technical support, particularly for underperforming districts. While the findings affirm that many barangays are trying to keep up with documentary requirements, gaps remain, especially where tools, training, and staffing are concerned. The study underscores the value of tailoring interventions not only to policy compliance but also to practical implementation support. Strengthening these aspects could lead to more transparent, accountable, and efficient local governance.