A COMPARISON PERFORMANCE OF UNION BANK AND KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK


Malkajgiri Ramyasrekha, Dr.Ghanathe Ramesh
Department of Management Studies, Vardhaman College of Engineering, Shamshabad, Telangana, India.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of comparing Union Bank of India (UBI) and Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB) is to assess their financial performance, service offerings, and market positioning. This comparison helps investors, customers, and analysts understand: Profitability: Analyze key financial metrics like net profit, return on assets (ROA), and return on equity (ROE). Growth: Monitor the deposits, loans, and total market share growth. Efficiency: Compare operational efficiency through metrics like cost-to-income ratio and asset quality. Customer Service & Products: Assess service offerings, adoption of technology, and satisfaction. Risk & Stability: Analyzing The Design/Methodology/Approach The design/methodology/approach to compare the performance of Union Bank of India (UBI) and Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB) involves the following steps: Data Collection: Collect relevant financial data from annual reports, balance sheets, and other publicly available resources such as financial ratios, profit & loss statements. Quantitative Analysis: Financial metrics used include: Profitability ratios: Net profit margin, return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA). Growth metrics: Year on year growth in deposits, loans and total assets. Efficiency ratios: Cost-to-income ratio, asset quality (NPAs), capital adequacy ratio (CAR). Qualitative Analysis: Evaluate non-financial aspects such as: Customer satisfaction and service offerings. Technological adoption and digital banking capabilities. Market positioning and strategic initiatives. Comparison & Interpretation: Compare the performance of the two banks by making use of the above-mentioned metrics to reach appropriate conclusions regarding their financial strength, growth, operational efficiency, and stability. Findings Findings from the comparative performance of Union Bank of India (UBI) and Kotak Mahindra Bank (KMB): Profitability: KMB is highly superior to UBI in terms of profitability measures such as ROE and ROA, as it is highly efficient in its operations and enjoys a higher margin. UBI has lower profitability due to its size, government ownership, and legacy issues. Growth: KMB is growing very well in terms of deposits, loans, and market capitalization because of its focus on digital banking and customer-centric products. UBI has been steadily growing but has a challenge in scaling up compared to private banks such as KMB, particularly in retail banking.
Keywords: Segment: Public Sector Bank (PSB) Market: Mass banking, government services, rural areas Profitability: Low profitability and high NPAs
Journal Name :
EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)

VIEW PDF
Published on : 2025-03-06

Vol : 10
Issue : 3
Month : March
Year : 2025
Copyright © 2025 EPRA JOURNALS. All rights reserved
Developed by Peace Soft