This study focused on the use of vodcasting as a teaching aid in providing English lessons to students who are into modular distance learning. It aimed to identify the level of students’ perceptions using vodcast in terms of teacher focused variables such as: voice quality, language use, knowledge of the subject; determine the level of students’ engagement using vodcast in terms of learning engagement, learning satisfaction and viewing willingness; provide students’ performance during pre-test and post-test using vodcasting; and find out if there is a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test upon the implementation of vodcasting. The study utilized quantitative method research to find out the effectiveness of vodcasting as a tool in language teaching. The researcher administered a pre-test before the use of vodcasting as a teaching innovation, after the second grading period and the use the of vodcast in delivering the lessons in English, the posttest was given. Also, a self-made questionnaire was given to identify the level of perceptions of the students in using vodcast. The respondents of the study were the forty (40) low-achieving students from Grade 7-10 of Suba National High School Gagalot Annex in the district of Majayjay, for the school year 2020-2021. The data gathered were tallied and interpreted using Weighted Average Mean (WAM) and Paired T-test. Hence, the result revealed that the level of perceptions of the students to the teacher who used vodcast were given the weighted average mean of 3.63, 3.72 and 3.72 in terms of voice quality, language use and knowledge of the subject respectively. On the other hand, the level of perceptions of students in learning engagement obtained a weighted average mean of 3.67, 3.75, and 3.69 when it comes to learning engagement, learning satisfaction and viewing willingness particularly. Therefore, students who are in the mode of modular distance learning find it motivating and enjoyable when viewing vodcast as an instrument in presenting lessons in English. The findings revealed a significant difference between the students’ performance based on the pre-test and post- test scores. The computed t= -14.476, -9.100, -11.665 and -9.611 and p= 0.00 means that lower than 0.05 level of significance, the null hypothesis was rejected.