QoL is a notion that has been frequently utilized in health care, despite being a difficult concept to describe (Somarriba Arechavala et al., 2015). In recent years, it has been extended to cover the broader population’s objective and subjective well-being. Well-being is usually measured objectively. Relates to objective life circumstances like housing. Subjective well-being, on the other hand, may relate to a sense of fulfilment in one’s life (Maditinos et al., 2014). According to Somarriba Arechavala et al. (2015), This is a part of study conducted in the year 2018 among the rural women about the health practices i.e. how they take precautionary methods to avoid the disease burden or disorder, do they have any resource information on that or they have any general awareness on the health practices. The study was falls under qualitative method and descriptive type, the universe was selected as Mandal/taluk in that women from Twelve different villages, the Mandal/taluk consists of 12 villages, from those villages the consistent sample technique was applied to select my sample size, around 315 women were selected for the study the standard questionnaire was opted for study. The quality of life depends on how much joyfully they spent every day with availability of resources and satisfaction of life, the women who spent their life the quality of life. Sleep, friends, money, contentment, sex, ability to work, energy to work, how pleased with your own life, enough money for health care, and the list goes on, the low Qol spent by women contributes to 21(6.7%), the moderate Qol spent by rural women is 285(90.5%), the high Qol life spent by rural women is 9(2.9).